Thinking Practices in Mathematics and Science Learning

This book's title presents questions such as: what are thinking practices?; what would schools and other learning settings look like if they were organized for the learning of thinking practices?; are thinking practices general or do they differ by disciplines?; if there are differences, what implications do those differences have for how we organize teaching and learning?; and how do perspectives on learning, cognition and culture affect the kinds of learning experiences children and adults have? It examines progress toward answers to these questions involving several agendas. These include increased interdisciplinary communication and collaboration; reconciling research on cognition with research on teaching, learning and school culture; and increasing the connections between research and school practice. This collection of cases concerned with teaching, learning and thinking on the part of teachers, students and researchers is also a set of interactions about the topic of thinking practices. Two general identifying criteria were used to organize the papers into sections. One focuses on identity and participation on communities of practice; the other focuses on the characteristics of activities designed specifically for learning and the display of specific thinking practices. Both criteria enter into the contents of all the papers, but the papers located in the first section focus more on issues of community and identity, and the papers located in the second section focus more on ways in which learning activities are organized. Together, the papers map a movement toward new ways, founded on a respect for the social complexity of teaching and learning, to research the relationships between thinking, learning and education. The volume as a whole aims to offer a foundation for a community of researchers to develop further a better understanding of the organization and enhancement of thinking practices.

Table of Contents:
Contents: Introduction. S.V. Goldman, J.G. Greeno, Thinking Practices: Images of Thinking and Learning in Education. Part I: Participation and Identity in Practice.M.K. Stein, E.A. Silver, M.S. Smith, Mathematics Reform and Teacher Development: A Community of Practice Perspective. M. Lampert, Studying Teaching as a Thinking Practice. J. Greeno, Trajectories of Participation and Practice: Some Dynamic Aspects for the Thinking Practices of Teaching, Educational Design, and Research. L. Godfrey, R.P. Moses, M.C. O'Connor, The Missing Data Point: Negotiating Purposes in Classroom Mathematics and Science. S.L. Star, Leaks of Experience: The Link Between Science and Knowledge. P. Eckert, Entitled to Know. Part II: Accomplishing Thinking Practices.A.A. diSessa, J. Minstrell, Cultivating Conceptual Change With Benchmark Lessons. A. Rubin, R. Hall, ...There's Five Little Notches in Here: Dilemmas in Teaching and Learning the Conventional Structure of Rate. G.B. Saxe, S.R Guberman, Emergent Arithmetical Environments in the Context of Distributed Problem Solving: Analyses of Children Playing an Educational Game. S. Goldman, Researching and Revisiting the Thinking Curriculum. M. Lynch, D. Macbeth, Demonstrating Physics Lessons. A.H. Schoenfeld, Making Mathematics and Making Pasta From Cookbook Procedures to Really Cooking. R. McDermott, V. Webber, When Is Math or Science? A.L. Brown, S. Ellery, J.C. Campione, Creating Zones of Proximal Development Electronically. M. Riel, Learning Communities Through Computer Networking. A. Collins, Learning Communities: A Commentary on Papers by Brown, Ellery, and Campione, and by Riel.

About the Author :
James G. Greeno, Shelley V. Goldman

Review :
"Fresh and clear perspectives are needed to study and interpret the complex world of teachers' and children's thinking as they communicate about and learn mathematics and science. The editors and authors of this book have succeeded in bringing together a diverse and important set of ideas that can provide these new perspectives. The use of social interaction theories appears to have promise for guiding the analysis and interpretation of the rich and complex data that arises from classroom observations, videotape studies, interviews, and similar research methods." —Mathematical Thinking and Learning