Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand: Te Rino: A Two-Stranded Rope

This edited collection asks how key New Zealand judgments might read if they were written by a feminist judge. Feminist judging is an emerging critical legal approach that works within the confines of common law legal method to challenge the myth of judicial neutrality and illustrate how the personal experiences and perspectives of judges may influence the reasoning and outcome of their decisions. Uniquely, this book includes a set of cases employing an approach based on mana wahine, the use of Maori values that recognise the complex realities of Maori women’s lives. Through these feminist and mana wahine judgments, it opens possibilities of more inclusive judicial decision making for the future. ‘This Project stops us in our tracks and asks us: how could things have been different? At key moments in our legal history, what difference would it have made if feminist judges had been at the tiller? By doing so, it raises a host of important questions. What does it take to be a feminist judge? Would we want our judges to be feminists and if so why? Is there a uniquely female perspective to judging?’ Professor Claudia Geiringer, Faculty of Law, Victoria University of Wellington ‘With this book, some of our leading jurists expose the biases and power structures that underpin legal rules and the interpretation of them. Some also give voice to mana wahine perspectives on and about the law that have become invisible over time, perpetuating the impacts of colonialism and patriarchy combined on Maori women. I hope this book will be a catalyst for our nation to better understand and then seek to ameliorate these impacts.’ Dr Claire Charters, Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Auckland ‘The work is highly illuminating and is critical to the development of our legal system ... It is crucial, not only for legal education, so that students of the law open their minds to the different ways legal problems can be conceptualised and decided. It is also crucial if we are going to have a truly just legal system where all the different voices and perspectives are fairly heard.’ Professor Mark Henaghan, Dean of the Faculty of Law, University of Otago ‘I believe this project is particularly important, as few academics or researchers in New Zealand concentrate on judicial method. I am therefore hopeful that it will provoke thoughtful debate in a critical area for society.’ The Honourable Justice Helen Winkelmann, New Zealand Court of Appeal

Table of Contents:
Part I: Introducing Te Rino: The Feminist Judgments Project Aotearoa 1. Ko Nga Muka o Te Rino: Threads of the Two-Stranded Rope Rhonda Powell, Elisabeth McDonald, Mamari Stephens and Rosemary Hunter 2. Law in Aotearoa New Zealand Mamari Stephens and Rhonda Powell 3. Introducing the Feminist and Mana Wahine Judgments Rosemary Hunter, Mamari Stephens, Elisabeth McDonald and Rhonda Powell Part II: Rights, Equality and Relationality Civil Rights 4. Taylor v Attorney-General [2015] NZHC 1706 5. Brooker v Police [2007] NZSC 307 Social Welfare 6. Ruka v Department of Social Welfare [1997] 1 NZLR 154 7. Lawson v Housing New Zealand [1997] 2 NZLR 474 Medical Decisions 8. Seales v Attorney General [2015] NZHC 1239 9. Hallagan v Medical Council of New Zealand HC Wellington CIV-2010-485-222, 2 December 2010 10. Re W [PPPR] (‘Re Williams[PPPR]’) (1993) 11 FRNZ 108 Family Relationships 11. Quilter v Attorney-General [1997] NZCA 207 12. AMO’H v AJO’H (‘Caldwell v Caldwell’) [2010] NZFC 48 Relationship Property 13. V v V [2002] NZFLR 1105 14. Lankow v Rose [1995] 1 NZLR 277 Employment 15. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Goodrum [2002] NZHRRT 13 16. Air Nelson Limited v C [2011] NZCA 466 Commercial Relationships 17. Stephens v Barron [2014] NZCA 82 Part III: Land and Natural Resources Customary Rights 18. Bruce v Edwards [2002] NZCA 294 19. Waipapakura v Hempton (1914) 33 NZLR 1065 Environment 20. Squid Fishery Management Company Ltd v Minister of Fisheries CA39/04, 7 April 2004 21. West Coast ENT Inc v Buller Coal Ltd [2013] NZSC 87 Part IV: Crime Sexual Offending 22. R v S [2015] NZHC 801 23. R v Sturm [2004] 1 NZLR 570 24. Vuletich v R [2010] NZCA 102 Defences 25. Police v Kawiti [2000] 1 NZLR 117 26. R v Wang [1990] 2 NZLR 529 Sentencing 27. R v Shashana Lee Te Tomo [2012] NZHC 71 28. R v Taueki [2005] NZCA 174

About the Author :
Elisabeth McDonald is Professor of Law at University of Canterbury, New Zealand. Rhonda Powell is Senior Lecturer in Law at University of Canterbury, New Zealand. Mamari Stephens is Senior Lecturer in Law at Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Rosemary Hunter is Professor of Law and Socio-Legal Studies at Queen Mary University of London.

Review :
Feminist Judgments Aotearoa is a fascinating, sometimes confronting, but ultimately extremely rewarding read which challenges us to see other legitimate possibilities in the law. The judgments and the commentary that precede them, are a powerful means of teaching us to see a legal case through a different lens, helpful both in the classroom and for established researchers, practitioners, and members of the judiciary... This collection offers an opportunity to step back and survey the land of the law, and to do so with fresh eyes – a valuable opportunity when many are practising or researching in highly specialised areas.