Examining Intelligence-Led Policing: Developments in Research, Policy and Practice

Foreword from Professor Emeritus Robert Reiner, London School of Economics, UK. This book provides a critical examination of intelligence-led policing strategies, including an investigation of innovative strategies such as Problem Oriented Policing (POP), problem-solving, and community policing, and in-depth analyses of the Kent Policing Model, which became the template for ILP models across the world, and the UK's National Intelligence Model (NIM). Intelligence-led policing (ILP) approaches have proved particularly attractive to senior police officers and policymakers because they promise to deliver more efficient and effective solutions to the problems of crime than traditional policing practices. However, this book shows that these approaches have delivered far less than their supporters would have us to believe. In part, this has been because of what James terms as 'police orthodoxy'. However, this cannot wholly explain the relative failure of ILP in Britain and elsewhere in the developed world. Drawing on a range of material including extensive interviews with key NIM figures including ACPO members, senior police managers, intelligence workers, police detectives and staff, James questions to what extent British policing can truly be said to be intelligence-led, and whether there is a popular mandate for an alternative to traditional Peelian practice, where police aim simply to deliver intelligent rather than intelligence-led policing. The book provides important insights into the debate on intelligence-led policing and the mechanics and politics of policy development. As such it will be of great value within the policing sphere and more broadly for public policy studies.

Table of Contents:
Foreword; Robert Reiner 1. Setting the contemporary policing scene 2. A history of policing practice in Britain 3. Intelligence-Led investigation 4. ILP in the contemporary era 5. ILP as a catalyst for policy/knowledge transfer 6. Evaluating the NIM: challenges to the model 7. Evaluating ILP and the NIM: Urban case study 8. Evaluating the NIM: County Case Study 9. The prospects for ILP A final reflection

About the Author :
Adrian James is a Senior Lecturer in Criminal Investigation, University of Portsmouth, UK. A detective for most of the 30 years of his police career, he has worked in various Scotland Yard departments, with the Regional Crime Squad, the National Crime Squad, and latterly was engaged in project work with HM Revenue and Customs and the Serious Organised Crime Agency.

Review :
"The book is the first comprehensive analysis of NIM, and as such makes a significant original contribution to knowledge and understanding of contemporary policing policy and the functioning and reform of police organizations [...] The author has drawn on both his distinguished career as a detective and manager of information, and his academic education. The product of these influences is a book that should be a long-lasting reference-point for debates about policing." - Robert Reiner, Emeritus Professor of Criminology, London School of Economics, UK "A timely and important contribution to the literature on police theories, this book presents an insider account of the development and recent history of Intelligence-Led Policing (ILP) in Britain. In so doing, James comprehensively analyses ILP, by building on the evolutionary and piecemeal path that the modern police service has trodden to arrive at a situation which he describes as the 'relative failure of ILP'. Interestingly, the use of an impressive range of literature and sources from the coal face of policing leads to provocative conclusions, not only about the police themselves but also about broader issues of criminal justice policy and investigative science. The book will certainly become required reading for police managers and I commend it to students of policing, security studies and the broad field of criminology." - Denis Clark, Charles Sturt University, Australia "This is a timely and highly significant book on policing and intelligence; it is useful not just to criminologists, academics, students, but to anyone interested in contemporary policing, policing history generally, intelligence systems broadly and the management of change, Wide ranging in theory and with new empirical information as well as correcting some mistaken time lines (themselves an intelligence tool) this is hugely relevant for current thinking on reforming policing broadly and police intelligence. This suggests another narrative of change from within as opposed to the broad political dominant narrative of police leadership failure and imposed change from outside. It will inform and encourage a wider debate. Adrian is to be congratulated on his contribution to our thinking that takes us far beyond the shorthand of the 'snooper's charter' of current legislative shorthand." - John G.D. Grieve, University of Portsmouth, UK and Professor Emeritus London Metropolitan University, UK "This book provides important insights in two key areas: the substantive debate around intelligence-led policing; and, the mechanics and politics of policy development. As such it will be of value within the policing sphere and more broadly for public policy studies. The book is based upon strong and unique access to key figures and policing personnel associated with the National Intelligence Model and intelligence led policing policy and implementation. It will be an important resource for those undertaking detailed academic research and analysis, for police practitioners, and for those involved with (or studying) policy practice and implementation." - Tim John, University of Glamorgan, UK "At a time when Britain is undergoing one of its periodic bouts of worry about policing and intelligence, Adrian James has provided a timely and critical analysis of 'intelligence-led policing'. Drawing on long experience as a practitioner, he has made excellent use of both academic and official literatures as well as extensive interviews in order to produce a fascinating account. James explains how the hopes of ILP's proponents have largely foundered on a mixture of police conservatism, a confusion of differing objectives and a generalised difficulty in understanding the value of 'intelligence'." - Peter Gill, University of Liverpool, UK