"Fitting the School to the Child: An Experiment in Public Education" provides a detailed account of a groundbreaking initiative in progressive education within the New York City public school system during the early 20th century. Written by Elisabeth Irwin and Louis A. Marks, the work documents a multi-year experiment conducted at Public School 64 in Manhattan, where traditional, rigid schooling methods were replaced by a curriculum tailored to the individual needs, capacities, and psychological profiles of children.
The text explores the practical application of educational psychology, detailing how students were classified and taught based on intelligence testing and social backgrounds rather than mere age or grade level. By emphasizing the development of the whole child, the authors argue for a more humane and effective approach to public instruction. This work is a significant historical document for educators, psychologists, and historians, offering deep insights into the early movement to reform public education and make the classroom a place of genuine individual growth.
Through its examination of grading, health programs, and social services within the school environment, "Fitting the School to the Child" remains a foundational text in the history of educational reform and the shift toward child-centered learning.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you may see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
