Whitehead and Bradley: A Comparative Analysis(SUNY series in Philosophy)

In his magnum opus, Process and Reality, Alfred North Whitehead claims a special affinity to Oxford philosopher Francis Herbert Bradley. McHenry clarifies exactly how much of Whitehead's metaphysics is influenced by and accords with the main principles of Bradley's "absolute idealism." He argues that many of Whitehead's doctrines cannot be understood without an adequate understanding of Bradley, in terms of both affinities and contrasts. He evaluates the arguments between them and explores several important connections with William James, Josiah Royce, George Santayana, Bertrand Russell, and Charles Hartshorne.

Table of Contents:
Preface and Acknowledgments 1. Introduction The Central Plan of This Essay Idealism and Realism Whitehead's Process Realism and Philosophical Method Bradley's Absolute and the Skeptical Method 2. The Metaphysics of Experience Historical Perspective Panpsychism Bradley's Finite Centres of Experience Whitehead's Actual Occasions 3. The Analysis of Experience Introduction The Specious Present Genetic Analysis and the Component Elements Whitehead's Interpretation of Bradley 4. Internal and External Relations Bradley in Relation and Contradiction Concrete Relatedness and Prehension Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Relations Extensive Relations and Abstraction 5. Extension and Whole-Part Relations Events versus Substance Cosmological Outlook Transmutation and the Theory of Society Cosmic Epochs and the Absolute 6. Time Temporal Unity and Direction The Eternalistic Theory of Time Replies to Some Objections to Whitehead 7. God and the Absolute Universal Absorption The Consequent Nature of God Epilogue Abbreviations Notes Bibliography Index

About the Author :
Leemon B. McHenry is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Wittenberg University

Review :
"The most dramatic contribution of this book is found in McHenry's extremely thorough treatment of the problem of relations in both philosophers. McHenry's discussion of Bradley's own critique of relations is clearer and more comprehensive than any to be found in the current literature, and he distinguishes far more carefully than prior treatments between Bradley's critique of internal and external relations and Whitehead's two different sorts of responses. "McHenry's most startling and controversial conclusion is that Whitehead has not really addressed or answered Bradley's famous critique and that the two positions stand opposed on the basis of relative plausibility rather than demonstrable logical superiority and inclusiveness. This flies in the face of the prior received interpretations of this issue and reveals the depth and mastery of McHenry's treatment in comparison to earlier commentaries. "This is a brilliant work of original historical and philosophical scholarship." -- George R. Lucas, Jr., National Endowment for the Humanities