The Constitution’s Text in Foreign Affairs

Ramsey describes the constitutional law of foreign affairs derived from an historical understanding of the Constitution’s text. Examining recurring foreign affairs controversies such as the power to enter armed conflict, the author shows how the words, structure, and context of the Constitution can resolve pivotal court cases and modern disputes.

Table of Contents:
Contents Acknowledgments Introduction: A Textual Theory of Foreign Affairs Law Part I: Sources of National Power 1. Do Foreign Affairs Powers Come from the Constitution? Curtiss- Wright and the Myth of Inherent Powers 00 2. Foreign Affairs and the Articles of Confederation: The Constitution in Context 00 Part II: Presidential Power in Foreign Affairs 3. The Steel Seizure Case and the Executive Power over Foreign Affairs 00 4. Executive Foreign Affairs Power and the Washington Administration 00 5. Steel Seizure Revisited: The Limits of Executive Power 000 6. Executive Power and Its Critics 000 Part III: Shared Powers of the Senate 7. The Executive Senate: Treaties and Appointments 000 8. Goldwater v. Carter: Do Treaties Bind the President? 000 9. The Non-Treaty Power: Executive Agreements and United States v. Belmont 000 Part IV: Congress's Foreign Affairs Powers 10. Legislative Power in Foreign Affairs: Why NAFTA Is (Sort of) Unconstitutional 000 11. The Meanings of Declaring War 000 12. Beyond Declaring War: War Powers of Congress and the President 000 Part V: States and Foreign Affairs 13. Can States Have Foreign Policies? Zschernig v. Miller and the Limits of Framers' Intent 000 14. States versus the President: The Holocaust Insurance Case 000 15. Missouri v. Holland and the Seventeenth Amendment 000 Part VI: Courts and Foreign Affairs 16. Judging Foreign Affairs: Goldwater v. Carter Revisited 000 17. The Paquete Habana: Is International Law Part of Our Law? 000 18. Courts and Presidents in Foreign Affairs 000 Conclusion: Text as Law in Foreign Affairs 000 Notes Index

Review :
The Constitution's Text in Foreign Affairs is impressive. Ramsey defies conventional wisdom that the words of the Constitution do not speak to most contemporary foreign relations law problems, showing instead how these words, as originally understood, can provide a nearly complete answer to fundamental modern questions of foreign relations law. This book is a real contribution to the field. -- Jack Goldsmith, Harvard Law School In this valuable book, Ramsey evaluates the debate concerning presidential and congressional powers in foreign affairs. While many scholars on both sides of this debate argue that the Constitution itself is little help in defining the relationships between the legislative and executive branch in this area, Ramsey argues that the Constitution's text is the crucial guide to explaining how the founders saw the separate and shared powers of the two branches...In a discussion with important ramifications, Ramsey also explores the meaning of the phrase "executive power" in the 18th-century context. Ramsey argues that in foreign policy and in U.S. Supreme Court decisions regarding the powers of the president and Congress, the text of the Constitution, and therefore the intentions of the framers, has been misinterpreted. -- W. W. Newmann Choice Ramsey approaches the foreign affairs text of the Constitution with high expectations. He places the words of the document front and center in his analysis, and argues that past scholars have failed to mine the text and structure of the Constitution for every insight into foreign affairs power...Writing with grace and clarity, Ramsey has produced a benchmark study that will illuminate future research but also will provide an accessible, lucid, and nicely opinionated Introduction to a set of too-long, neglected constitutional issues. -- Aziz Huq New York Law Journal