About the Book
To the ongoing assessment of our current procedures for nominating presidential candidates, John Geer brings historical perspective, a careful evaluation of the accumulating evidence,and much good sense. The result is a book that challenges widely held beliefs and that will instruct all those with an interest in presidential nominations, whether as reporters, candidates, students, or citizens. Stanley Kelley, Jr., Princeton University
In a clearly written and wide-ranging study [Geer] presents a wealth of data and conclusions. Using often original criteria, Geer concludes that voters in primaries are not very unrepresentative of appropriate control groups and that they base their votes on the personal characteristics of the candidates. Moreover, he demonstrates the conditions under which participation rates and information levels will be high. In the last part of the book, Geer discusses the role of the media and how the rules tend to undermine the ability of voters to cast meaningful votes. The author concludes with a call for regional primaries, for a greater role for party leaders, and for some ballot reforms. . . . Geer has produced a useful reference work that can stimulate undergraduate discussions. Choice
Are voters in presidential primaries truly qualified to choose the nominees? Although in recent years many concerned citizens, scholars, and writers have posed this question and much attention has been focussed on the subject, until Nominating Presidents there has not been an in-depth treatment of the qualifications of voters in presidential primaries. This groundbreaking study presents and systematically examines a formidable array of data on voters in primaries, including evidence from the 1988 presidential nomination. Geer examines survey research, aggregate data and more. To aid in the interpretation of these data, Geer develops a set of standards for assessing the qualifications of voters in presidential primaries. His findings suggest that although voters are more qualified than previous studies have shown, there are still problems using voters to nominate candidates. He therefore proposes a new system of selection that should overcome these problems. The real significance of this study, however, is not the proposed system of presidential nominations, but the detailed assessment of voters in presidential primaries.
The text is enhanced by more than twenty tables that present graphic information on subjects ranging from the influence of presidential primaries from 1912 to 1988; the ideological composition of voters in presidential primaries; causes and percent of turnout in presidential primaries; and various aspects of news media coverage, among others. Three helpful appendices define turnout variables, describe survey questions, and review the coding of open ended comments. Nominating Presidents will be of particular interest to those in the fields of political science and American political history as well as to students and teachers of courses in electoral behavior, campaigns and elections, and American political parties.
Table of Contents:
Foreword by James W. Davis
Preface
Introduction
The Representativeness of Voters in Presidential Primaries
Participation in Presidential Primaries
Information and Voters in Presidential Primaries
Voting in Presidential Primaries
The Media and Voters in Presidential Primaries
A Few Rules of the Game
A Proposal for Reform
Appendix I: Definition of Variables Used in Explaining Turnout
Appendix II: Description of Survey Questions
Appendix III: The Coding of the Open-Ended Comments
Bibliography
Index
About the Author :
JOHN G. GEER is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Arizona State University, Tempe. He has published in the American Journal of Political Science, Journal of Politics, Public Opinion Quarterly, and American Politics Quarterly.
Review :
"John Geer provides the most concrete and thorough defense I have seen of public participation in the nominating process. He commands a considerable body of empirical evidence, old and new, and he uses that evidence to tackle big normative questions with admirable directness. Along the way he challenges some important tenets of conventional political wisdom with sufficient vigor to invite the close attention of scholars and politicians alike."-Larry M. Bartels Associate Professor University of Rochester
"To the ongoing assessment of our current procedures for nominating presidential candidates, John Geer brings historical perspective, a careful evaluation of the accumulating evidence, and much good sense. The result is a book that challenges widely held beliefs and that will instruct all those with an interest in presidential nominations, whether as reporters, candidates, students, or citizens."-Stanley Kelley, Jr. Princeton University
.,."This highly readable book should be of interest to historians, political scientists, politicans, and general readers interested in the American political process. The book's appeal is enhanced by the use of information tables and graphs, explanatory notes at the end of each chapter, and relevant bibliographical citations throughout the text. If a paperback edition comes out, I recommend its use as a supplement to the text in recent U.S. survey courses as well as government classes."-History Reviews of New Books
?...This highly readable book should be of interest to historians, political scientists, politicans, and general readers interested in the American political process. The book's appeal is enhanced by the use of information tables and graphs, explanatory notes at the end of each chapter, and relevant bibliographical citations throughout the text. If a paperback edition comes out, I recommend its use as a supplement to the text in recent U.S. survey courses as well as government classes.?-History Reviews of New Books
?Geer asks if voters in presidential primaries are really as incompetent and unrepresentative as critics of the nominating process allege. In a clearly written and wide-ranging study he presents a wealth of data and conclusions. Using often original criteria, Geer concludes that voters in primaries are not very unrepresentative of appropriate control groups and that they base their votes on the personal characteristics of the candidates. Moreover, he demonstrates the conditions under which participation rates and information levels will be high. In the last part of the book, Geer discusses the role of the media and how the rules tend to undermine the ability of voters to cast meaningful votes. The author concludes with a call for regional primaries, for a greater role for party leaders, and for some ballot reforms. . . . Geer has produced a useful reference work that can stimulate undergraduate discussions. Recommended for all academic libraries.?-Choice
..."This highly readable book should be of interest to historians, political scientists, politicans, and general readers interested in the American political process. The book's appeal is enhanced by the use of information tables and graphs, explanatory notes at the end of each chapter, and relevant bibliographical citations throughout the text. If a paperback edition comes out, I recommend its use as a supplement to the text in recent U.S. survey courses as well as government classes."-History Reviews of New Books
"Geer asks if voters in presidential primaries are really as incompetent and unrepresentative as critics of the nominating process allege. In a clearly written and wide-ranging study he presents a wealth of data and conclusions. Using often original criteria, Geer concludes that voters in primaries are not very unrepresentative of appropriate control groups and that they base their votes on the personal characteristics of the candidates. Moreover, he demonstrates the conditions under which participation rates and information levels will be high. In the last part of the book, Geer discusses the role of the media and how the rules tend to undermine the ability of voters to cast meaningful votes. The author concludes with a call for regional primaries, for a greater role for party leaders, and for some ballot reforms. . . . Geer has produced a useful reference work that can stimulate undergraduate discussions. Recommended for all academic libraries."-Choice
