Ambivalent Recognition: The Harmful Social Consequences of an Ethical Good(New Directions in Critical Theory)

About the Book

Recognition has become one of the key concepts of contemporary critical theory, heralded by thinkers such as Axel Honneth and Charles Taylor. It is widely claimed that a person must be recognized by others in order to realize their own identity and that the lack of recognition constitutes a form of oppression or injustice. Is recognition always a good thing?

In this ambitious and compelling book, Kristina Lepold challenges the common assumption that recognition is positive, emphasizing its ambivalent role in social life. She offers a systematic account of the complex nature of recognition, showing how it can implicate us in oppressive or otherwise problematic arrangements. Lepold engages with different approaches for thinking about recognition-including Axel Honneth's influential theory, as well as arguments made by Louis Althusser, Pierre Bourdieu, and Judith Butler-which she reconstructs in a nuanced and accessible fashion.

By one of the most original voices in the new generation of critical theorists, Ambivalent Recognition is a must-read for anyone interested in not only one of critical theory's key concepts but also the larger question of why unjust social arrangements often prove so stubborn and difficult to change.

Table of Contents:
Foreword, by Martin Saar
Acknowledgments
Introduction
1. The Context of Honneth’s Theory of Recognition
2. The Foundations of Honneth’s Theory of Recognition
3. The Struggle for Recognition
4. Althusser and the Reproduction of the Social Order
5. Bourdieu and the Reproduction of Social Inequality
6. Butler and the Reproduction of Binary Gender Normality
7. Ambivalent Recognition
Notes
References
Index

About the Author :
Kristina Lepold is junior professor of social philosophy and critical theory at Humboldt University Berlin and an associated member of the Center for Social Critique.

Ciaran Cronin has translated numerous works of political philosophy and social theory by prominent authors including Jürgen Habermas and Rainer Forst.

Martin Saar is professor of social philosophy at Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main.

Review :
Ambivalent Recognition is an impressive first book by Kristina Lepold, one of the most exciting voices of a new generation of critical theorists. She argues, convincingly, that we should see recognition—usually thought of as something positive—as ambivalent, for it can make us complicit in problematic social arrangements. There is nothing more productive for a theory than to examine it so incisively that all its internal problems and difficulties come to the surface. Kristina Lepold confronts recognition with its critics, who emphasize that a positive attribution of recognition to a person or group comes at the price of inclusion in an existing order of domination. A masterful study of the negative consequence of perpetuating social oppression. According to the French tradition, recognition is always subjecting, while authors such as Charles Taylor and Axel Honneth have emphasized its ethical potential. Kristina Lepold’s fascinating book rejects this seemingly binary choice. The book is a must-read for everyone interested in contemporary critical theory. Feminists and multicultural theorists often argue that oppressed people have to misrepresent their interests—and their selves—in order to be politically legible. Lepold’s important book sheds new light on what is at stake in claims that the marginalized are misrecognized. Kristina Lepold’s Ambivalent Recognition makes an original and important contribution to our understanding of how our recognition of ourselves and others is often caught up in, and contributes to, a web of oppressive practices.