EU Counter-Terrorist Policies and Fundamental Rights: The Case of Individual Sanctions(Oxford Studies in European Law)

Sanctions against private individuals have been widely used in the fight against terrorism, but not without significant controversy. This book examines the complex institutional and substantive issues arising from the European Union's practice of listing and sanctioning private individuals suspected of supporting terrorism. It provides a comprehensive analysis of the issues raised by individual sanctions adopted to give legal effect to United Nations lists and those drawn up by the EU itself. The book demonstrates that individual sanctions endanger the protection of fundamental rights and the functioning of the European legal order. While the ECJ has in principle confirmed that all Community sanctions are subject to full judicial review irrespective of whether they give effect to UN lists or EU lists, in practice individuals do not have the necessary procedural rights at their disposal. Additionally, protection from listings of individuals as terrorist suspects in the second and third pillar remains very limited. This raises the possibility that national constitutional courts could challenge the supremacy of European law in reaction to this disregard of fundamental rights and foundational principles.The book provides a comprehensive analysis of these complex legal issues, and situates them in their international context. The basis of the book is a critical review of the case-law of the CFI and the ECJ on individual sanctions. Conclusions are drawn how the EU Courts should provide fundamental rights protection and suggestions are made how the adoption procedure of individual sanctions could comply with general principles of EU law.

Table of Contents:
Introduction 1: European Sanctions against Individuals: Classification and Origins 2: The Legal Basis of Community Sanctions: Moving Competences from One Pillar to Another? 3: The Right of Access to Justice 4: Limits of Fundamental Rights in the Face of Terrorism 5: Judicial Review of European Sanctions Giving Effect to UN Lists of Terrorist Suspects 6: Protection from Autonomous European Sanctions: Community Law and Union Lists 7: What are the Alternatives? Adoption and Review Conclusions

About the Author :
Dr. Christina Eckes is a post doctoral researcher at the University of Amsterdam. Prior to this, she worked as lecturer at the University of Surrey (2007-2008), Guildford, where she co-founded the Surrey European Law Unit (SELU). After having completed her studies at the University of Trier and Lausanne with the First State Examination in Law (Germany), she did a master's degree (LLM) in European Community Law at the College of Europe in Bruges. She defended her PhD thesis on European sanctions against private individuals at King's College London in February 2008 and remains a Visiting Fellow at the Centre of European Law at King's College. She has published several articles in the fields of European Union and European Human Rights Law. Her particular research interests include the external relations of the European Union, access to justice, constitutional implications of multilevel regulation and counter-terrorism sanctions against individuals.

Review :
`If one were to choose a single book on the topic, I would recommend this one...Eckes writes well. She is particularly strong on EU law and able to explain sophisticated issues about legal basis, competencies and different procedures in a manner that is both interesting and informative' Martin Scheinin, Book Reviews `...the first systematic appraisal of individual sanctions...exceptionally well timed in coinciding with forthcoming sanctions appeals, but it also gives food for thought, the wider issues surrounding individual sanctions provide a fascinating source of discussion about the EU's "constitutional" maturation...Eckes offers a stimulating "must read" for EU lawyers and international lawyers alike' Luke Butler, European Law Review