Phenomenology and the Norms of Perception

In the philosophical literature, it is customary to think of perception as being assessable with respect to epistemic norms. E.g., the whole discussion around disjunctivism, which is now often considered to be the dominant, if not the default position in philosophy of perception, is, by and large, framed and motivated by epistemological concerns about truth and falsity. This book argues that perception is normative in another, more fundamental sense. Perception is governed by norms that Doyon calls perceptual, that is, immanent to its own structure. This does not mean that perceptual norms are cut-off from external facts; it rather means that they are constitutive moments of our experience of these facts. Perceptual norms are, in that sense, constitutive or enabling norms in that they establish what perception is. To articulate this view, he draws in the repertoire of the phenomenological tradition, in the work of Edmund Husserl and Maurice Merleau-Ponty in particular. Like Kant, both phenomenologists were concerned with the question of the unity of experience and sought to identify the conditions of possibility for having a perception, which they conceive not as a mere sensible experience of the outer world, but as a continuous and meaningful experience of reality. Unlike Kant, however, neither phenomenologist immediately identified these conditions with cognition or epistemic criteria. For both phenomenologists, perception has its own standards, its own conditions of possibility. Perception obtains when it unfolds concordantly or coherently; and when the perceptual progression corresponds to or is in harmony with one's goal or interest, perception can also be said to be optimal. From the phenomenological point of view, concordance (Einstimmigkeit) and optimality (Optimalität) are the two basic perceptual norms governing over perceptual experience, and much of the book is devoted to clarifying their meaning and to address the philosophical consequences that follow from this insight.

Table of Contents:
Introduction Part I: WHAT ARE PERCEPTUAL NORMS? INSIGHTS FROM CLASSICAL PHENOMENOLOGY 1: Husserl's Normative Account of Perception 2: Perceptual Normativity in Merleau-Ponty Part II: THE EMBODIMENT OF NORMS 3: Bodily Self-Awareness and Agency 4: Multisensory Perception 5: Perceptual Learning PART III: SOCIALITY AND NORMATIVITY 6: Perceiving Others 7: Perceiving Together

About the Author :
Maxime Doyon is currently Associate Professor of Philosophy at Université de Montréal, Canada. He earned his PhD in 2009 at the Husserl Archive of the Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, and was postdoctoral research fellow at McGill University and University of Chicago, and more recently Humboldt fellow at the Universität-zu-Köln and at the Centre for Subjectivity Research at the University of Copenhagen. His research focuses on various topics and problems in philosophy perception, philosophy of mind, and especially phenomenology. He is the co-editor of the volume Normativity in Perception (2015).

Review :
Phenomenology and the Norms of Perception is a most welcome addition to the philosophical literature on perception and perceptual experience. It offers a comprehensive and compelling account of the main claims and arguments of the two main phenomenologists of perception. Moreover, it is lucidly written and sprinkled with illuminating examples, making it accessible to novice and expert alike. There has been, for some time, talk about a "normative turn" in contemporary phenomenology. This well-informed and well-argued monograph by Maxime Doyon, with its remarkable combination of exegetical skill and argumentative clarity, gives fresh impetus to this trend. The book draws mainly on Husserl and Merleau-Ponty to explore the normative dimension of perception in the context of contemporary philosophy and psychology.