Kant's Modal Metaphysics

What is possible and why? What is the difference between the merely possible and the actual? In Kants Modal Metaphysics Nicholas Stang examines Kants lifelong engagement with these questions and their role in his philosophical development. This is the first book to trace Kants theory of possibility all theway from the so-called pre-Critical writings of the 1750s and 1760s to the Critical system of philosophy inaugurated by the Critique of Pure Reason in 1781. Stang argues that the key to understanding both the change and the continuity between Kants pre-Critical and Critical theory of possibility is his transformation of the ontological question about possibility-what is it for a being to be possible?-into a question in transcendental philosophy-what is it to represent an object as possible? The first half of Kants Modal Metaphysics explores Kants pre-Critical theory of possibility, including his answer to the ontological question about the nature of possibility, his rejection of the traditional ontological argument for the existence of God, and his own argument that God must exist to ground all possibility. The second half examines why Kant reoriented his theory of possibility around the transcendental question, what this question means, and how Kant answered it in the Critical philosophy. Stang shows that, despite this reorientation, Kants basic scheme for thinking about possibility remains constant from the pre-Critical period through the Critical system. What had been an ontological theory of possible being is reinterpreted, in the Critical system, as a theory of how we must represent possible objects, given the nature of our intellect.

Table of Contents:
Preface Introduction Part One: Kant's Pre-Critical Modal Metaphysics 1: Logicism and Ontotheism 2: Is Existence a Real Predicate? 3: Real Conflict, Real Grounds, Real Possibility 4: Grounding Possibility 5: Kant's Modal Argument Part Two: Kant's Critical Modal Metaphysics Real Possibility and the Critical Turn Three Kinds of Real Possibility Nomic Necessity The Unity of Kant's Modal Metaphysics The Antinomy of Kant's Modal Metaphysics Note on Sources Bibliography Index

About the Author :
Nicholas F. Stang is Assistant Professor in the Department of Philosophy at University of Toronto.

Review :
The book is a tour de force. In ten closely argued chapters that display both philosophical acumen and a consummate grasp of a wide range of Kant's texts and their historical context, Nicholas Stang shows how a set of interconnected issues in modal metaphysics play an absolutely central role in Kant's pre-Critical philosophy, in motivating the Critical turn, and finally in the Critical philosophy itself. The resulting narrative is rich in insight and compelling ... This is a book of impressive scope, made all the more impressive by the fact that it thereby sacrifices nothing in quality. Nick Stang offers an extremely meticulous and original study of Immanuel Kant's theory of modality. It is the first book dedicated solely to Kantian modality in the Anglophone Kant literature, crowning the recent surge of articles on the subject, while also setting up a fertile ground for further discussion. The book's appeal is not limited to Kant readers. Considering its historical focus and scope, Stang's book is unusually rigorous, analytically argued, and well informed by twentieth-century modal metaphysics and logic, making it perfectly accessible to those who are interested in modality from a contemporary metaphysical point of view. Kant's Modal Metaphysics charts a fascinating course from Kant's pre-Critical ideas about modality through to his more mature, Critical, view. We are not just offered an account of what Kant said about some narrow topicmodalitybut rather a narrative according to which questions arising from Kant's modal metaphysics play a crucial role in motivating and shaping the Critical philosophy