Co-operative Enterprise in Comparative Perspective: Exceptionally Un-American?

Co-operative enterprises, which are democratically owned and governed by their workers, customers, or suppliers, have long captured the imagination of activists and social scientists alike. In centering economic democracy and a collectivist-democratic logic, and in embodying a "third way" alternative to profit-maximizing corporations and state-owned enterprises, co-operatives offer the promise of a more sustainable and equitable economy. Despite extensive study of co-operatives' real and imagined benefits, we know little about the conditions under which they achieve the lasting scale needed to be a viable alternative and transform the economy. Under what conditions can co-operatives achieve such scale? And are such conditions present in the United States, where, despite repeated organizing efforts, co-operatives remain exceptionally rare at scale? Through a rigorous comparative-historical analysis of co-operative enterprises in different national contexts, this book seeks to answer these questions. Deploying two different variants of the new institutionalism, Spicer treats the United States as a central case of comparative failure, as contrasted to three rich democracies where the co-operative business model has been more successful: Finland, France, and New Zealand. The cause of co-operatives' comparative weakness in the United States is identified as reflecting the joint effect of economic liberalism and structural racism. Only in the United States did the co-operative face, in its initial development, two well-entrenched incumbents operating with competing ownership models: the investor-owned firm and the race-based chattel slavery system of ownership of people. Proponents of these two models acted to deprive the co-operative movement of resources, and undermined the solidarity at the co-operative business model's heart, splintering the American co-operative movement in the process. In subsequent waves of co-operative organizing, advocates have never fully succeeded in overcoming these initial obstacles, resulting in a different outcome in the United States, consistent with broader conceptions of the United States as a perennial outlier (i.e., ""American exceptionalism""). In contrast, in the successful cases, advocates were better able to leverage resources to animate a national solidarity and procure the necessary political and economic resources to achieve scale.

Table of Contents:
Chapter 1 Introduction: Co-operative Enterprise, Exceptionally Un-American? American Co-operative Development Through a Comparative Lens The Argument in Brief Plan and Outline of the Book Chapter 2 Conceptualizing The Comparative Development of Co-operative Enterprise Co-operatives 101: A Primer Case Selection and Overviews Comparing Institutionalisms: Historical Institutionalism vs. Field Theory Chapter 3 Finland, the Co-operative Commonwealth? Co-operatives as an Offensive Strategy in Finnish Nation Building, 1800s - 1945 Co-operatives as Defense: Finlandization, The Cold War and A Tale of Two Co-operative Movements, 1946 - 1995 Co-operatives as Globalization Insurance: Liberalization, European Integration, and the Return of Russia, 1995 - Present Chapter 4 Co-operatives As the Heart of France's Social and Solidarity Economy The French Evolution? Co-operatives' Slow Emergence in Modern France, 1780s - 1860s A Field in Full: From <"The Co-operative Republic> " to Les Trente Glorieuses, 1870s - 1960s The Rise of the Social and Solidarity Economy (ESS), 1970s/80s - Present. Chapter 5 Liberalism and Co-operatives: New Zealand's Strange Bedfellows New Zealand as a <"Utopian Capitalist> " Experiment Gone Awry: 1840 -1870. Field Settlement: Alternative Ownership in The Making of Modern New Zealand, 1870 - 1970. Field Rupture: Co-operatives Adapt to the Liberalization of New Zealand, 1984 - Present. Chapter 6 American Co-operation in the Nineteenth Century: A Field Denied A Field in Formation? Four Strands of Antebellum American Co-operation, 1790 - 1860. The Role of Slavery In Constraining Antebellum Co-operation Post-Bellum American Co-operation: <"Wage Slavery> " and the Knights of Labor, 1865 - 1880s Chapter 7 American Co-operation Since 1900: An Incomplete and Partially Organized Field Partial Field Successes: Populist Farmers, Progressive Credit Unions, New Deal Utilities Co-operation Lost: Consumers' Retail Goods and Mutually Owned Financial Enterprises Worker and Multi-Stakeholder Co-operatives: A Dream Deferred? American Co-operation: An Incomplete Field Chapter 8 Conclusions Of A Chrononaut Co-operatives as Exceptionally Un-American From Factors to Fields: The Value of A Field Theory Approach From Theory to Practice: Conclusions for the American Co-operative Movement Appendix References

About the Author :
Jason Spicer is an Assistant Professor in the Marxe School of Public and International Affairs at CUNY Baruch College, where he focuses on social and community entrepreneurship. Prior to joining CUNY, he spent five years on the faculty of the University of Toronto (St. George), where he oversaw the economic development concentration in the graduate urban planning program. He holds a PhD in Political Economy from MIT. He has published many articles on co-operatives and related alternative enterprise forms in academic journals across the social sciences.