Kantian Ethics: Value, Agency, and Obligation

This volume presents a selection of Robert Stern's work on the theme of Kantian ethics. It begins by focusing on the relation between Kant's account of obligation and his view of autonomy, arguing that this leaves room for Kant to be a realist about value. Stern then considers where this places Kant in relation to the question of moral scepticism, and in relation to the principle of 'ought implies can', and examines this principle in its own right. The papers then move beyond Kant himself to his wider influence and to critics of his work, including Hegel, the British Idealists, and the Danish philosopher and theologian K. E. Logstrup, while also offering a comparison with William James's arguments for freedom. The collection concludes with a consideration of a broadly Kantian critique of divine command ethics offered by Stephen Darwall, arguing that the critique does not succeed. General themes considered in this volume therefore include value, perfectionism, agency, autonomy, moral motivation, moral scepticism, and obligation, as well as the historical place of Kant's ethics and its influence on thinkers up to the present day.

About the Author :
Robert Stern, University of Sheffield Robert Stern has been at the University of Sheffield since 1989, having been a graduate and Research Fellow at St John's College, Cambridge. He is the author of Hegel, Kant and the Structure of the Object (Routledge 1990), Transcendental Arguments and Scepticism (OUP, 2000), Hegel's 'Phenomenology of Spirit' (Routledge 2002), and Understanding Moral Obligation: Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard (CUP, 2012), while a first collection of his papers was published by Oxford University Press in 2009 under the title Hegelian Metaphysics.

Review :
"excellent...should appeal to a wide variety of readers...clarifying and enriching Stern's view of Kant, but also extending it to address an impressive range of philosophers and issues." -- Kantian Review "In addition to the quality of the arguments, I also recommend the book for Stern's writing-style. Each of the 14 essays is very clearly written. They each contain close textual analyses that advance the scholarship on the particular author, and Stern's reflections on the systematic plausibility of each argument enhances the systematic debates on topics such as obligation, value or moral agency. Stern has previously published on many different aspects of philosophy, and one characteristic of his writing that I find particularly refreshing is how he uses distinctions from other areas in philosophy to sharpen our understanding of Kant's philosophy. Stern's book is an important advancement of central debates in Kant scholarship. I highly recommend it to Kant scholars and anyone interested in moral philosophy of a Kantian bent." -- Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews